Weeks after Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial ended without a verdict, newly public accounts from a juror — combined with Patrick Clancy’s first major interview since the tragedy — are adding another layer to one of the most closely watched family-murder cases in America.

Clancy was charged with killing her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — inside the family’s Duxbury, Massachusetts, home on Jan. 24, 2023. She has not denied causing their deaths, but her defense argued that she was not criminally responsible because she was experiencing severe postpartum mental illness. The prosecution disputed that explanation and argued that her actions showed planning and awareness.

One of the details now receiving renewed attention involves the family’s baby-monitor history. During the trial, former co-worker Margaret Hamp testified that Clancy regularly watched her children remotely while working overnight shifts as a nurse. On one occasion, Hamp said, Clancy became so concerned after seeing her infant daughter crying on the monitor — and being unable to reach Patrick — that she called police to conduct a wellness check.

That testimony has become especially striking in hindsight.

Prosecutors portrayed Jan. 24, 2023, as a day when Lindsay appeared organized and capable of communicating normally. Patrick testified that she seemed to be having “one of her best days,” describing her as happy and engaged with the children before asking him to leave the house to pick up medicine and dinner.

The defense, however, presented a dramatically different picture of the months leading up to the killings. Witnesses described Clancy as increasingly fearful about her mental health, while relatives and friends testified that she had repeatedly sought treatment and worried that something was seriously wrong. Her former mother-in-law told jurors that Lindsay had been “begging for help.”